Nityo
nityānām, the chief of the all eternals. Cetanaś cetanānām. He is the
supreme living entity of all living entities. He is also living entity.
So if I am a living entity, I have got a form, so why the supreme living
entity will not have a form? This is poor fund of knowledge. He is not
nirākāra. But we cannot estimate His ākāra. That is nirākāra. Nirākāra means
to estimate. We cannot estimate how big He is. That means nirā...
Nirākāra does not mean formless. When there is in the śāstra, nirākāra,
this word is used, nirākāra means
He has no prakṛta-ākāra, material form. That is nirākāra, not that he
has no form. That is poor fund of knowledge. He is
sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha (Bs. 5.1). Therefore Kṛṣṇa says in the
Bhagavad-gītā, avajānanti māṁ mūḍhā mānuṣīṁ tanum āśritam: (BG 9.11) "My original form is like human being." And the Bible also it is said, "Man is made after the form of God."
Friday, August 15, 2014
We Indian's,We Indian's are Weird-Phir Bhi Dil Hai Hindustani
Freedom in the Mind, Faith in the Words, Pride in our Souls, Let's salute the Nation on 68th Independence Day..
Happy Indian Independence Day to All
Thursday, July 31, 2014
Islamists warning to Hindus to convert to Islam by saying that they foll...
Zaid Hamid's agree and saying Vedas are old they follow Vedas n saying Hindu forgot Sri Ram Listen and with the above they accepted Islam is a sub branch of Hinduism.
Islamists warning to Hindus to convert to Islam by saying that they following Vedas?
They give proof that Mohd Prophet is mentioned in Vedas and Hindu Puranas? means vedas shows proof of Mohd Prophet n Quran will come and Mohd Prohpet and Quran is born from Vedic Dharma.. They say all the Avatars of lord Vishnu are of Allah but Mohd Prophet of Arab's Saint photo is not there?
He also say that you pray to Lord Rama n Lord Krishan he is non other than Allah but u not call him Through Allah name u call him as lord Rama and Lord Krishna, but u not recognise them as Allah- They are Allah-- pray them.
He also say that during the death time of human u will drop a water in his mouth and pray a sanskrit word it is " Ilah illia illillaha" in another language but still not say u Muslim?
He also say in the video that u Hindus put Tilak -- Namam and Tilaka Nammam -- that Tilak is only a "Kalima"
He also say that Panchaksri Mantram "Om Nama Shivaya" is a Kalma.......?
He also says that Lord Vishnu's avatar will come at the end "Kalki avatar" he is "Allah" last Rushi of Islam-- but saying that Hindus are not following true religion?
He is giving proof Vedas and Pranas and Our Sanskrit - for his Religion and Mohd Prophet and Allah-- it meant ? what all he said is true then -- Islam is a Sub Branch of Vedic Religion / Sananthana Dharma..?
What is this? Is this is a Religion of Peace? they are mis-understand of Quran n Vedas and want to destroy other religion (Vedic Religion) and Vedic culture n other non Muslims n non Muslim culture, God said all religion are a path of God home only?
God is great and God is one and he will be everywhere, The Supreme God have many different names Anantha Narayana /Sri Krishna / Jesus/ Gautam Buddha/ Allah- Vedic Shiva.......
but don't kill other people on name of God, with any name if we call him with a love and respect and devotion he will appear or will come to us or protect us, but he (GOD) don't say that u not called me As Sri Krishna /Allah or any other name of him, thus i don't come or don't protect you or if you not pray from calling that name (Allah) which is word meaning of God in Arab Language or not prayed me through that culture only then you are not following me or and you will be killed. If he said it he is not God at all.
Monday, June 2, 2014
Friday, May 23, 2014
Wednesday, May 14, 2014
Friday, May 9, 2014
Syed Zaid Hamid latest - Kargil Operation : A Milestone for Pak Army - A...
If
our Army men loss his life we accept it and If one life of Indian lost
also we lost the great Indian and lost the life of a Human and we also
accept the dead bodys of our lost Indian Army men.
After win of the
war also if our people (or just like of family members lost) if they
were missing then then we can't say it is win.. we don't want to
celebrate our win by walking on our men dead bodies
Great Words:-
Every
Citizen and King of Country Must think of what he have done and need to
be do for their Country, but not need to be think what Country have
given to him..because A King and the Citizens are for the country, but
The Country is not for the King or its Citizens..
our Army men loss his life we accept it and If one life of Indian lost
also we lost the great Indian and lost the life of a Human and we also
accept the dead bodys of our lost Indian Army men.
After win of the
war also if our people (or just like of family members lost) if they
were missing then then we can't say it is win.. we don't want to
celebrate our win by walking on our men dead bodies
Great Words:-
Every
Citizen and King of Country Must think of what he have done and need to
be do for their Country, but not need to be think what Country have
given to him..because A King and the Citizens are for the country, but
The Country is not for the King or its Citizens..
After attacks of 900 years and Ghaznavi 17 attacks on India, India is still there and will be there forever.
The
society/Culture/Civilization of India is there from 5000 years back and
will be there in Future... we are strong on our Civilization and
Culture and also by the Religion.
Jai Sri Krishna/Jai Sri Ram/ Jai Allah/Jai Gurugovind/Jai Buddha/ Jai Jesus......
Final word ! ! Jai Hind
The
society/Culture/Civilization of India is there from 5000 years back and
will be there in Future... we are strong on our Civilization and
Culture and also by the Religion.
Jai Sri Krishna/Jai Sri Ram/ Jai Allah/Jai Gurugovind/Jai Buddha/ Jai Jesus......
Final word ! ! Jai Hind
Monday, May 5, 2014
Wake up Europe Before its too late Playlist...
Wake up Europe
Wake up /A rise ohh Europe before its to late to protect Your countries from False Islamist Preachers and Shira Law which not give rights to Non Muslims in their Laws.
Sharia Laws-of Stupid Muslims, I am not against Islam, I am Against to Stupid Muslim, who use Islam for killing non Muslims on name of Islam n destroying/divide the nations on name of Islam.
It is shame less that now In Islamic world doesn't have a good preacher or Good Mullah to teach good teachings to their Muslims about their own religion and they are destroying them self with false teachings. All Mullahs n preachers are Stupid n all not following their own Qur'an.
Wake up /A rise ohh Europe before its to late to protect Your countries from False Islamist Preachers and Shira Law which not give rights to Non Muslims in their Laws.
Sharia Laws-of Stupid Muslims, I am not against Islam, I am Against to Stupid Muslim, who use Islam for killing non Muslims on name of Islam n destroying/divide the nations on name of Islam.
It is shame less that now In Islamic world doesn't have a good preacher or Good Mullah to teach good teachings to their Muslims about their own religion and they are destroying them self with false teachings. All Mullahs n preachers are Stupid n all not following their own Qur'an.
Sunday, May 4, 2014
Ya Allah Ya Khuda Hey Bhagawan Ohh Venkateshaa (Govinda)
A Muslim king who is going to destroy Tirupati Temple, he sudden got out off his eye vision.. then he realize that he insulted BB nacharama and given bad words and trying to destroy or disrespect others religion and come to know that God is one and sings a song... and he corrected his mistake and got again Eye Vision....(this is real story and Telugu film Sree Tirupathi Venkateswara Kalyanam is done based on it).
Song in English...
YA Allah Ya Khuda Hey Bhagawan Ohh Venkateshaaa (Govinda)
God is one The God is only one..U can Call Allah or Venkannna (Govinda) (2)
God is one The God is only one (2)
by turning towards Mecca for prayer or go to Seven hills (Tirupati) to do prayer, rich people or poor people all prayers will goes to the god home only.
If u study Quran or Puran's /Sri Bhagavad Geeta.. all the ways goes to the god home only...
God is one The God is only one..U can Call Allah or Venkannna (Govinda) (2)
God is one The God is only one (2)
Open the eyes and come out from maya or ego and see the real you can find the god in everywhere, u can see god in stones, Animals -monkey and human being as human and all the life in the universe is one of the spirit soul of supreme soul (GOD).
Allah Hey Bhagawan
Allah
Ya Khuda
Hey Bhagawan
Oh Deva Deva Deva (Lord of the Lords Govinda)
Krishna/Shiva/Allah is one and the same and its just a different names of the same GOD.. Who is Anantha Narayana.. He Who have no beginning and no end.. he who don't have in-form(Un-Materialistic nature)/Nir-Akar and he can also able to take form /Materialistic/Akar/Sakar.. We can take up any of his form/avatar and can pray to Nir-Akhar form of Anantha Narayana/Allah/Shiva/Jesus.
Just like All Rivers flow in different areas or places but finally merge in ocean at the End n its is only one example for reference if u find yourself u can have more examples on Maya of Maya Pati or Lord Narayana
He is our father and mother. He is creator of world and he is every where, he is in you and he is in me and he is in all of us. just we need to know him by getting qualification of Bhakthi..
Friday, May 2, 2014
Thursday, May 1, 2014
Friday, April 18, 2014
Akar or Sakar and Nir-Akar Form (Materialistic and non Materialstic forms) of God Sri Krishna/Shiva/Vedic Shiva (Allah)/Ammba
isvarah paramah krsnah
sac-cid-änanda-vigrahah
anädir ädir govindah
sarva-kärana-käranam
sac-cid-änanda-vigrahah
anädir ädir govindah
sarva-kärana-käranam
"Krsna who is known as Govinda is the Supreme Godhead. He has an eternal blissful spiritual body. He is the origin of all. He has no other origin and He is the prime cause of all causes."
Nirākāra means He, He has no such form, as we have got this material form.
(Bhagavad Geeta (BG-2.1))
Paraḥ means transcendental, beyond this material conception. Kṛṣṇa, or
the Absolute, Nārāyaṇa, that is para. Nārāyaṇaḥ paraḥ avyaktāt. Nārāyaṇa
is not anything of this material world. Nārāyaṇa, Kṛṣṇa, Viṣṇu. The
Absolute Personality of Godhead, He is not anything of this material
world. When we use this word, nirākāra, that means His form is not
anything of this material world. But He has got His form. That is a
transcendental form. Sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ (Bs. 5.1). Nirākāra means
He, He has no such form, as we have got this material form. This
material form is neither of the three transcendental bliss,
sac-cid-ānanda. This is asat, acit, and nirānanda. This body, this
material body is asat, acit, and nirānanda. Therefore, when in the Vedic
literature or in authorized statement we find "nirākāra," that means
His form does not belong to this asat, acit, or nirānanda. But He has
His form. Divyam. Janma karma me divyam (BG 4.9).
Divyam, transcendental. And Śrīpāda Śaṅkarācārya also, who especially
preached impersonalism, he also admits that nārāyaṇaḥ paraḥ avyaktāt:
"Nārāyaṇa, the form of Nārāyaṇa, is beyond the range of this avyakta."
Nirākāra means we cannot calculate the ākāra, the actual form.
BG- 2.13
So similarly, we, we living entities, we are also spiritual atoms. We
are spiritual atoms. And our magnitude also has assessed in the śāstras.
That magnitude is stated in the Purāṇas that keśāgra-śata-bhāgasya
śatadhā kalpitasya ca (CC Madhya 19.140).
Keśāgra, your hair. I have no long hair. You have got. Now, you can see
the point of the hair, keśa-agra. Agra means the point of the hair.
Keśāgra-śata-bhāgasya. Now, the point of the hair, you divide into
hundred. That is imaginable. That is not imaginable by you, how the
point of the hair can be divided into hundred. Keśāgra-śata-bhāgasya.
Now, you take one part of that division and again divide into hundred.
This is beyond your experience, beyond your power. The, by arithmetic
calculation the mathematicians say that "The point has no length and
breadth." Oh, this is, this is, this is a disappointment. Because he
cannot measure the length and breadth of the point, therefore he says
like that. But point has length and breadth. Aṇor aṇīyān mahato mahīyān.
Therefore a certain class of philosophers, they are astonished simply
by seeing the great magnitude of the Lord, but there is smaller,
smallest, aṇor aṇīyān. These are much smaller than the atom, but that is
beyond our experience. Therefore we say, nirākāra. Nirākāra means
we cannot calculate the ākāra, the actual form. Nirākāra does not mean
that it has no form. It has form. Just see. That they say, that the
point has no length and breadth. Similarly, the soul has everything,
length and... Within that point it has got his head, leg, everything,
consciousness, everything there. And because it is beyond the
calculation of our human knowledge, therefore they are disappointed:
"Nirākāra, nirākāra, nirākāra." Not nirākāra. It has ākāra. But we are
so, our senses are so blunt that we cannot calculate.
Nirākāra means He has no prakṛta-ākāra, material form.
BG-7.1
When we say bhagavān nirākāra, that means either we have no knowledge of Bhagavān or nirākāra means He is not a form like us
BG-7.1
There
are two living beings. One is Bhagavān, and the other is the living
being as we are. That is the Vedic version. Nityo nityānāṁ cetanaś
cetanānām (Kaṭha Upaniṣad 2.2.13). Bhagavān means He is also a living
being. He is not nirākāra. When we say bhagavān nirākāra, that means
either we have no knowledge of Bhagavān or nirākāra means
He is not a form like us. Our form and Kṛṣṇa's form—different. Kṛṣṇa is
complete spiritual, divine, and we are, at the present moment, although
we have got our spiritual form within this body, but because we have no
vision of the spiritual form, we are taking this body as our form. This
is called illusion.
Nirākāra means "who has no form"—it does not mean that God has no form.
He has got form, but His form is different from this form upon which you
have got experience.
Srimad Bhagavatam (SB)-1.2.1
So there are different types of bodies within this material world. We
can compare. Just like ant's body, a fly's body, and my body. A fly's
body may remain for few years, or, few hours. So our body may remain for
few years. And similarly, there are other living entities like Brahmā,
their body remains for a few decades. But every body, each body, is
subjected to this law of nature: birth, death, disease, and old age. So
God's body is not like that. It is eternal. Here in this material world
we can possess a body which may exist for millions of years, but that
does not mean it is eternal. It is not eternal. But God's body is
eternal. Therefore, in the Vedic language, when it is said, nirākāra-nirākāra means
"who has no form"—it does not mean that God has no form. He has got
form, but His form is different from this form upon which you have got
experience. Our experience is whatever form we can think of, even
Brahma's form, that is liable to be annihilated. But God's form is not
like that. So when in the Vedic language it is said, nirākāra—means nir,
nir means "not," and ākāra means "form"—that means "God's form is not
like ours." It is not that He has no form. He has form, but His form is
different from ours.
Nirākāra means to avoid. How Supreme God can be nirākāra? If the Supreme Lord is the supreme father.
SB-1.2.6
Real dharma is sarva-dharmān parityajya mām ekaṁ śaraṇaṁ vraja (BG 18.66). This is dharma. All bogus type of dharma—Hindu religion, Muslim religion, this religion, that religion—they are not dharma.
Therefore it is said here, sa vai puṁsāṁ paro dharmaḥ. Paraḥ means
Supreme. What is that? Yato bhaktir adhokṣaje, "Wherein this is taught,
'Just surrender to the Supreme Lord, Kṛṣṇa, that is first-class
religion." All other religions, they are bogus. That is not religion.
Just like good citizenship means to abide by the laws of the state, of
the government. That is good citizenship. Similarly, a real religious
person means who is abiding by the orders of the Supreme Lord.
Unfortunately, they have no information of the Supreme Lord. Although
the Lord, the Supreme Lord Kṛṣṇa, is present, still, they are thinking
that Supreme Lord is nirākāra. Nirākāra means
to avoid. How Supreme God can be nirākāra? If the Supreme Lord is the
supreme father... We have got experience: I am a person, my father is
person, his father is person, his father is person... In this way, if
you go to the topmost platform to find out the Supreme Person or Supreme
God, why He should be imperson?
Nirākāra means His body, ākāra, or form, is not like ours. That is to be understood. He is sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ. SB-5.5.31
First Brahmā was created in the lotus flower from Garbhodakaśayī Viṣṇu,
so Brahmā is the first creature, living creature, but he also is born of
Viṣṇu. Therefore Kṛṣṇa said, aham ādir hi devānām (Bg 10.2). Then
Brahma, Lord Śiva was born, Rudra. In this way, Viṣṇu or Viṣṇu-tattva,
that is original. Sarva-yoniṣu kaunteya sambhavanti mūrti..., ahaṁ
bīja-pradaḥ pitā (BG 14.4).
Still, he is nava-yauvanaṁ ca. Nava-yauvanam means it begins from the
sixteenth year. He looked like that, a boy of sixteen to twenty years
old, and... This is only description of His transcendental body,
sac-cid-ānanda vigrahaḥ (Bs. 5.1). This is the difference between
material body and spiritual body. It doesn't matter. The Māyāvādīs, they
cannot think of, that material body can be so beautiful, neither they
can think of, that the Supreme to possess a body... But He possesses
body. The description of the body is there. But it is not like our body.
Therefore nirākāra means His body,
ākāra, or form, is not like ours. That is to be understood. He is
sac-cid-ānanda-vigrahaḥ. Īśvaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇaḥ sac-cid-ānanda vigrahaḥ
(Bs. 5.1). Vigraha means body. He has got body, but not a body like
ours. That is misunderstanding.
Nirākāra means He has no form, He has no eyes, no leg. If I say that God
has no leg, no eyes, it is defaming. He has got the brilliant eyes.
Yac-cakṣur eṣa savitā. Here is one of the eyes of Kṛṣṇa: the sun.
SB-6.1.14
So
these nirākāra vādīs, they are..., they cannot think of that there can
be any eye which can act from Vaikuṇṭha, which we cannot ascertain how
far it is, still you can keep traveling. We can simply think of that "I
can see three yards; therefore Kṛṣṇa can see also three yards." But the
actual fact is Kṛṣṇa can see you from any distant place. Sarvata pāṇi
pādas... sarvato. He has got eyes everywhere. That eyes is not exactly
your eyes. Therefore it is called apāṇi acakṣur. Acakṣur means his eyes
are not like your eyes. So as soon as we consider "Kṛṣṇa like me, Kṛṣṇa
like me," that is natural for a foolish person. That is the first
consideration. Because they cannot adjust that God can have eyes
different from me, therefore they take nirviśeṣa, nirākāra. Nirākāra means
He has no form, He has no eyes, no leg. If I say that God has no leg,
no eyes, it is defaming. He has got the brilliant eyes. Yac-cakṣur eṣa
savitā. Here is one of the eyes of Kṛṣṇa: the sun. When as soon as they
declare "God has no eyes," if we take in that way that we cannot see, He
has no eyes, then it is blaspheme.
That is another thing. All-pervading we also accept. He is brahmajyoti.
He is spread all over the creation. That is His nirākāra. Another
meaning of nirākāra, that He hasn't got His form like
us—sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha—you may say that.
SB-6.1.22
So these varieties of this material world, wherefrom it came? What is the answer?
Guest (2): From God.Prabhupāda: Then how God can be nirākāra or impersonal?
Guest (2): Nirākāra means all-pervading.
Prabhupāda: That is another thing. All-pervading we also accept. He is brahmajyoti. He is spread all over the creation. That is His nirākāra. Another meaning of nirākāra, that He hasn't got His form like us—sac-cid-ānanda-vigraha (Bs. 5.1)—you may say that. Or nirākāra means where the varieties are not manifested.
Nirākāra does not mean God has no akāra. That nirākāra means that not
this material akāra. Iśavaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇah sac-cid-ānanda vigrahaḥ.
His body is sac-cid-ānanda. That is completely impossible to see within
this material world.
SB-7.9.2
Pāṣaṇḍi means devil, or nondevotee. Abhaktā hīna cara. Be careful not to
mix with nondevotee who imagines about God. They do not believe in God
actually. This pāṣaṇḍi means who do not believe in God. They think that
there is no God, but they simply say, "Yes, there is God, but God has no
head, no tail, no mouth, nothing." And then what is God then? But these
rascals say nirākāra. Nirākāra means
there is no God. Say frankly that there is no God. Why do you say,
"Yes, there is God, but He has no head, no tail, no leg, no hand"? So
what is there? So this is another cheating. Those who are atheist, they
say frankly, "I do not believe in God. There is no..." That we can
understand. But these rascals, they say, "There is God, but nirākāra." Nirākāra means there is no God, but sometimes the word is used nirākāra. But that nirākāra does not mean God has no akāra. That nirākāra means
that not this material akāra. Iśavaraḥ paramaḥ kṛṣṇahsac-cid-ānanda
vigrahaḥ. His body is sac-cid-ānanda. That is completely impossible to
see within this material world. Our body is not sat. It is asat. This
body which I have got now or you have got, it will remain so long this
life... And when it is finished, it is finished forever. You'll never
get this body again. Therefore asat.
Our body is asat, acit and nirānanda, just opposite. It will not stay,
and there is no knowledge, acit, and there is no bliss. Always we are
unhappy. So nirākāra means not a body like this. His body is different.
SB-7.9.2
Kṛṣṇa's another name is narakṛti. Our body is imitation of Kṛṣṇa's body,
not that Kṛṣṇa's body is imitation of our body. No. Kṛṣṇa has got His
body, narakṛti, nara-vapu. These things are there. But that vapu is not
like this asat. Our body is asat. It will not stay. His body is
sac-cid-ānanda. Our body is asat, acit and nirānanda, just opposite. It
will not stay, and there is no knowledge, acit, and there is no bliss.
Always we are unhappy. So nirākāra means
not a body like this. His body is different. Ānanda cinmāyā rasa
pratibhavitabhis (Bs. 5.37). Ānanda-cinmāyā. Aṅgāni yasya sakalendriya
vṛtti-manti paśyanti pānti kalayanti ciraṁ jaganti (Bs. 5.32). His
aṅgāni, aṅgāni, parts of the body, are described,
sakalendriya-vṛtti-manti. I can see with my eyes. My, this special
function of my, this part of the body is to see. But Kṛṣṇa,
sakalendriya-vṛtti-manti—He can not only see, but He can eat also. That
is import. By seeing, we cannot eat, but whatever we offer, if Kṛṣṇa
sees, He eats also. Aṅgāni yasya sakalendriya-vṛtti-manti. So how we can
compare Kṛṣṇa's body with our body? But avajānanti māṁ mūḍhāḥ (BG 9.11).
Those who are rascals, they think that "Kṛṣṇa has two hands, two legs;
therefore I am also Kṛṣṇa. I am also." So don't be misled by the
rascals, pāṣaṇḍi. Take as there in the śāstra, learn it from authorized
sources, and be happy.
Nirākāra means nirākṛta ākāra, "This ākāra, this form, is being
nullified." Nirākāra does not mean there is no ākāra. This body. When it
is said, nirākāra, that means the soul, the Supersoul or the soul, has
no this ākāra, as we see.
So soul has got form. It is not formless. Similarly, Kṛṣṇa has got also
form. But that form is different from this form. When in the śāstras it
is said, nirākāra, nirākāra means
nirākṛta ākāra, "This ākāra, this form, is being nullified." Nirākāra
does not mean there is no ākāra. This body. When it is said, nirākāra,
that means the soul, the Supersoul or the soul, has no this ākāra, as we
see. Just like we are seeing some dog or some cat or some hog, some
tree, some plants, so many, eight million four hundred thousands of
forms, but this is not the form. Nirākāreti. Not this form. The soul has
got a different form. That is described. Keśāgra-śata-bhāgasya śatadhā
kalpitasya ca (CC Madhya 19.140).
We cannot see, at the present moment. So as we cannot see you. I am not
seeing you, you are not seeing me... Just like a man's son dies, or
father dies. He cries, "Oh, my father is gone, my father is gone." Where
is your father gone? Your father is lying on the floor. Why do you say
the father is gone? "No, he's gone. He's no more." That means this thing
which has gone, he has never seen. He has seen simply this outward
body, dress. This is called ignorance. I am not seeing you; still, I am
speaking that I see you. So if I cannot see you, the part and parcel of
God, how can I see God with these eyes?
All the above para and explanation is given in Sri Bhagavad Gita as it is -Holly Book and Srimad Bhagavatam-- Translation of Srilla Prabhupada -Acharya and Guru.
Shiva VS Vishnu- they both are one and the Same......
Rudraanaam shankarashchaasmi vittesho yaksharakshasaam;
Vasoonaam paavakashchaasmi meruh shikharinaamaham.
And, among the Rudras I am Shankara; among the Yakshas and Rakshasas, the Lord of
wealth (Kubera); among the Vasus I am Pavaka (fire); and among the (seven) mountains I am the
Meru. (from Sri Bhagavad Geeta)
Shiva is the 27th name in the Vishnu Sahasranaamam
rudra is the 114th name
ahadev is the 492nd name
sivaha -607th name
lokadyaksha -135th name
2 names that make it clear that Lokadyaksha is indeed Narayana is
upendra -brother to indra
vamana-the dwarf form
11th chapter of the bhagavath Gita Sri Krishna shows universal
forms and arjuna is able to see all the rudras as a part of this form
hence Siva is a part of supreme..and is not the supreme himself .In the
same chapter He shows Arjuna his ultimate 4 armed form as Narayana
with disc ,conch,mace and lotus and then transforms back to a human
form ..also that Ganges water that originates from the toes of
Narayana,Shivan takes on his head ...
different meanings of Narayana
resting place of all jivas
human goal
resting on the cosmic waters
In the Vedas
The Sama Veda reads: "'Om Namo Narayanayeti mantra upasaka Vaikuntha
bhuvanam gamishyati', or "Whosoever chants the 'Om Namo Narayana' mantra
reaches the ultimate goal Vaikuntha planet where one attains eternal
blissful life." Vaikuntha is the supreme spiritual abode; there is
nothing that exists beyond Vaikuntha, Vaikuntha means 'no desires'.
n the Yajurveda it says Om adha nitya Narayan ha, brahma narayanaha,
shivasca narayana ha, shankarsca narayanaha and kalacha narayanaha,
sarva bhutasca mekam via narayana Karan purusha makarana parabramahan'
and ultimately it says 'Savo deve eko Narayana na dwitiyacha kaschit'
("There is only one God Narayana and no second"). He Himself expands as
Brahma the creator, Vishnu the maintainer and Shiva as the annihilator.
Whether you read Rig Veda or any other Vedas and Puranas it has said
Lord Narayan is the supreme and there is absolutely nothing beyond Him,
it says in Srimad Bhagavatam 'Yesha tu Narayanam devam adevam isham'
('Narayan is the lord of the lords beyond him there is nothing exists').
Whoever worships with love and devotion achieves the highest
destination Vaikuntha.
Vedas say that devotees of Narayana, Vishnu are quite rare, and still
more rare are those who are pure devotees (of Vishnu, Narayana,
Krishna). "nava-kotyas tu devanam rishayah sapta-kotayah narayanayanah
sarve ye kecit tat-parayanah" "There are ninety million demigods and
seventy million sages, who are all called narayanayana, devotees of Lord
Narayana. Among them, only a few are called narayana-parayana/direct
devotees are called narayana-parayanas.
all chit and achit are all the body of Narayana ..Lord Brahma says so to Lord Rama after defeating Ravana
" jagathsarvam shareeram te"
this entire universe is your body
and Rama is an incarnation of Sriman Narayana!
Adi Sankaracharya also says in bhaja govindam to sing the 1000 names of Vishnu
गेयं गीता नाम सहस्रं,
ध्येयं श्रीपति रूपमजस्रम्।
नेयं सज्जन सङ्गे चित्तं,
देयं दीनजनाय च वित्तम् ॥२७॥
Sing thousand glories of Lord Vishnu, constantly remembering his form in
your heart. Enjoy the company of noble people and do charity for the
poor and the needy. ॥27॥
NATURE OF SRI KRISHNA 'SHIVA'
Shiva means "all auspicious" Sri Krishna is all auspicious yes so nature
of Sri Krishna is 'Shiva' agreed .. but ... Rudra is not the supreme
..rudra is a part of the supreme he is not supreme himself ..
Yajurveda clearly says, 'Om
adha nitya Narayan ha, brahma narayanaha, shivasca narayana ha,
shankarsca narayanaha and kalacha narayanaha, sarva bhutasca mekam via
narayana Karan purusha makarana parabramahan' and ultimately it says
'Savo deve eko Narayana na dwitiyacha kaschit' ("There is only one God
Narayana and no second"). He Himself expands as Brahma the creator
(Generator), Vishnu the maintainer (Operator) and Shiva as the
annihilator (Destroyer)
So, GOD =
G as Generator(we call him Brahma in this form)
O as Operator (we call him Vishnu in this form)
D as Destroyer(we call him Siva in this form)
So it is the same supreme god whom Vaishnavas call him as VISHNU and Shaivas call him as Siva and some may call him as Allah (Vedic shiva) (Kabba-shiv ling and mohd paigambher or mohd prophet father is devote of lord shiva). So who still see the difference. Please understand it is all his play so please dont get confused under the influence of MAYA !
So, GOD =
G as Generator(we call him Brahma in this form)
O as Operator (we call him Vishnu in this form)
D as Destroyer(we call him Siva in this form)
So it is the same supreme god whom Vaishnavas call him as VISHNU and Shaivas call him as Siva and some may call him as Allah (Vedic shiva) (Kabba-shiv ling and mohd paigambher or mohd prophet father is devote of lord shiva). So who still see the difference. Please understand it is all his play so please dont get confused under the influence of MAYA !
so its MY OPINION that Sriman Narayana is the supreme !
Final word: Respect All Religion as all religions are path of God only
Just like All Rivers flow in different areas or places but finally merge in ocean at the End n its is only one example for reference if u find yourself u can have more examples on Maya of Maya Pati or Lord Narayana
He is our father and mother. He is creator of world and he is every where, he is in you and he is in me and he is in all of us. just we need to know him by getting qualification of Bhakthi..
Sunday, April 13, 2014
Non-Muslims will not have equal Humanrights - Zakir Naik
Dear Zakir naik, 2+2=4 and 2*2=4 and 3+1=4 and i can give u logic of the same as
said by u--------------------------------------------
one teacher
came and said Earth is around and other teacher said Earth is Flat..
u select which teacher for science ------- like wise we also can't allow u (ZAKIR NAIK)
I CAN GIVE U MORE LOGICS LIKE YOUR SILLY LOGICS.
AWAKE UP EUROPE / AMERICA/ NORTH AMERICA/ AUSTRALIA/CANADA/RUSSIA/CHINA/ INDIA ... AND SEE HOW THIS MUSLIM IS SAYING NO RIGHTS TO NON MUSLIMS IN THEIR MAJORITY COUNTRY THEN WHY U ALLOWING MUSLIMS TO BUILD THEIR MOSQUE AND RELIGION IN YOUR COUNTRY...
AWAKE OH BHARATHA/ ARISE OH BHARATHA.
Thursday, April 10, 2014
Freedom of Religion to All - by Lord MahaVishnu
But now a days few religions and its teachers are teaching hate and killing on other religion people is a false idea that can't be appreciate by any God (Sri Krishna /Shiva/Allah /Buddha /Guru Govind/ Jesus)
(FEW MUSLIMS CHANGED ALLAH WORDS ... AS BELOW.. DON'T CHANGE. FLLOW TRUE QURAN)
Allah says "Kill idolators wherever you find them. You will go to heaven." (Mentioned in Corrupted Quran)
Sri Krishna says "I do not want you to kill my own creations for no reason. However, you have the right to kill someone if he/she is posing a threat to your life, your loved ones life or to the society (which includes Hindus, Muslims & everybody)
Allah says "Only by being a Muslim, you can go to heaven." ((it was not said by Allah, the Quran is corrupted by Arabs n Muslims) and All Muslims are following now a Corrupted Quran))
Sri Krishna says "No matter what your religion is. Only by being a GOOD HUMAN, you will go to heaven"
Allah says "Love your fellow Muslims as they are your brothers & sisters. And those who are non-muslims & those who do not believe in Allah, keep yourself away from them as they are Kaafirs". ((it was not said by Allah, the Quran is corrupted by Arabs n Muslims) and All Muslims are following now a Corrupted Quran)
Sri Krishna says "Love each and every creation of mine irrespective of their religion. Love even those who do not believe me and those who are atheists. I do not have ego problem like humans & I do not punish some one for not believing me. Instead, I do miracles and make that person himself come towards me".
Allah says "Kill idolators wherever you find them. You will go to heaven." (Mentioned in Corrupted Quran)
Sri Krishna says "I do not want you to kill my own creations for no reason. However, you have the right to kill someone if he/she is posing a threat to your life, your loved ones life or to the society (which includes Hindus, Muslims & everybody)
Allah says "Only by being a Muslim, you can go to heaven." ((it was not said by Allah, the Quran is corrupted by Arabs n Muslims) and All Muslims are following now a Corrupted Quran))
Sri Krishna says "No matter what your religion is. Only by being a GOOD HUMAN, you will go to heaven"
Allah says "Do not try to find me in idols. Worship me as unseen and you will go to heaven." ((it was not said by Allah, the Quran is corrupted by Arabs n Muslims) and All Muslims are following now a Corrupted Quran))
Sri Krishna says "You have the freedon to worship me in any form. I am not concerned about that. I am only concerned about the true faith you have for me in your heart."
Allah says "Pray 5 times a day. Only then I will be happy & send you to heaven".
Sri Krishna says "First take time to accomplish your duties & responsibilities. I'll be happy if you call my name even a single time in a day with true faith"
Quran is a word derived from Sanskrit word Puran (some of Muslims scholars like Zakir naik said the vedas are the first words and Sri Bhagavad Geeta is the first of God and Quran is the final word).. then if Hindus follow first word of God then why they feel and hate on Hindus and other religions, means they are became egoist and ego will turn any person into evil.
Allah=Amba / ShivaShakti/ Vedic Shiva
Shiva is an transcendental form of Sri Maha Vishnu / Sri Anantha Narayana/ Sri Krishna
Buddha is an avatar of Sri Anantha Narayana
Sai Baba/ Kabir Das - Fakir is an Guru who preach Sab ka Malik Ek hain and said Allah and Sri Rama is one and only one. He prayed both forms (non form -Allah n form -Sri Rama). But why this zakir naik says the Sri Rama is false god. Whether he is better then Sai Baba or Kabir Das.. Zakir naik will not be a compared with Divine grace of Sai Baba and Kabir das.. (Don't listen him (Zakir naik.. He is fool)
Sri Guru Govind is an Guru who preach Sab ka Malik Ek hain and prayed to Sri Krishna and established a new path from the old Hinduism -there is no difference in Sikhs and Hindus/ Sri Guru Gov-ind is a Guru an transcendental form of Lord Sri Anantha Narayana (who is also called a Govindam/ Govinda)
Jesus visited India in his child hood days and studied the Buddhism and Hindusim, He is a Guru an transcendental form of Lord Sri Anantha Narayana.
!! Form and Non Form of God !!
Krishna/Shiva/Allah is one and the same and its just a different names of the same GOD.. Who is Anantha Narayana.. He Who have no beginning and no end.. he who don't have in-form(Un-Materialistic nature)/Nir-Akar and he can also able to take form /Materialistic/Akar/Sakar.. We can take up any of his form/avatar and can pray to Nir-Akhar form of Anantha Narayana/Allah/Shiva/Jesus. He is our father and mother.
He is creator of world and he is every where, he is in you and he is in me and he is in all of us. just we need to know him by getting qualification of Bhakthi..
RELIGION FREEDOM IN INDIA
Freedom of religion in India is a fundamental right guaranteed by the country's constitution.[1] Modern India came into existence in 1947 as a secular nation and the Indian constitution's preamble states that India is a secular state. Freedom of religion is established in tradition as Hinduism does not recognise labels of distinct religions[2][3] and has no concept of blasphemy or heresy.[4][5] Every citizen of India has a right to practice and promote their religion peacefully. However, there have been a number of incidents of religious intolerance that resulted in riots and violence. These incidents have been condemned by the governmental administrations, private businesses, and judicial systems.
India is the birthplace of four major world religions: Hinduism, Jainism, Buddhism and Sikhism. Yet, India is one of the most diverse nations in terms of religion. Even though Hindus form close to 80 percent of the population, the country also has large Muslim, Sikh, Christian, Jain and Zoroastrian populations. Islam is the largest minority religion in India, and the Indian Muslims form the third largest Muslim population in the world, accounting for over 12 percent of the nation's population.
In India all the religion people live peace full and have their temples and mosques and church for this Pakistani Muslims want to do Gazaw e Hind on India.. is This is correct then .. need to think on follow of Islam of Pakistan is wrong, as they own Allah talks about freedom of Religion, but this Pakistani wont follow it, they always say India is a Hindu state and want to do war on it, but to us and all religion people India is a Secular State where all people live happily and practice their own religion freely.
I ASK ZAKIR NAIK OR ZAID HAMID OR AKBHARUDDIN OWISI TO SHOW ONE MUSLIM COUNTRY OR GOVT OR SHIRA LAW WHICH GIVES FREEDOM TO OTHER RELIGION PEOPLE IN THEIR COUNTRY OR IN THEIR LAW, THEY DON'T GIVE RIGHTS OR DON'T GIVE PERMISSION TO CONSTRUCT TEMPLES OR CHURCHES AND ASK TO PAY JIZYA TAX TO NON MUSLIMS (WHO DONT EARN) TO BE SAFE IN THEIR COUNTRY AND THIS PEOPLE TALKING ABOUT FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND PEACE FULL ISLAM AND ALWAYS TALK ON INDIA AS A HINDU STATE.
INDIA IS SECULAR STATE AND INDIA IS FOR EVERYONE.
I ASK ONE QUESTION TO ZAKIR NAIK OR ZAID HAMID OR AKBHARUDDIN THEY TALK ABOUT CASTE SYSTEM AND UNTOUCHABILTY IN HINDUISM, NOW IT IS NOT THERE,YES I SAY IT IS THERE IN EARLY AGES NOW IT IS RECTIFIED.
IN CASTE SYSTEM ALSO WE DON'T KILL ANY BODY IN HINDU RELIGION ON CASTE SYSTEM BASIS LIKE YOU: SIRYA GOVT KILLING/ VIRUS ATTACK ON SIRYA PUBLIC AND PAKISTANI BOMB ATTACK AND MANY ATTACKS ON CHIRTIANS AND NON MUSLIMS(HINDUS) AS DUE TO THEIR GOVT (PAKI GOVT) GIVEN PERMISSION TO DROP BOMB ON THEIR LAND TO KILL TERRORIST IF ANY INNOCENT GOT KILL THIS WILL BE ACT OF PAKI GOVT AS AGAINST THIS IN THEY ATTACK NON MUSLIMS AND KILLINGS ON NAME OF RELIGION.
IRAN AND IRAQ, PAKISTAN - KILLING OF SHIA AND SUNNI AND MOHAMADIYA AND EVEN BOMB BLASTS ON MOSUQE AND RECENT NEWS .. IS THIS NOT WORST THEN CASTE SYSTEM OF HINDUS.
EXAMPLES:
At least 22 Shia pilgrims, many of them women and children, were killed Tuesday in a bomb attack on their bus in western Pakistan.
The bomb exploded near the bus packed with passengers returning from Iran to their home city of Quetta in Balochistan, officials said.
At least 20 people were wounded, said Shafqat Anwar Shawani, assistant police commissioner for Mastung district.
Pakistani Shia Muslims search the wreckage of a destroyed bus after a bomb attack on the Pakistan-Iran highway on Jan. 21, 2014
Mass graves in Iraq have become well known since the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein.
International Experts estimated 300,000 victims could in these mass graves alone. The mass graves mostly included the remains of Shia Muslims and ethnic Kurds killed for opposing the regime between 1983 and 1991, she said.
[1]
Some of the information below is taken from Fact Sheet - Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor and Bureau of Public Affairs
AND MANY MORE ATTACKS BETWEEN SHIA AND SUNNI AND MOHAMIDYA -U DONT HAVE UNITY IN U R RELIGION AND SAYING RELIGION OF PEACE AND FREEDOM OF RELIGION.. FIRST BRING PEACE IN YOUR RELIGION POLITICS.
JIHAD- YOU HAVE CHANGED THE MEANING OF JIHAD AND CORRUPTED YOUR QURAN.
FINAL WORD- FIRST CORRECT YOUR SELF AND THEN POINT OUT OTHERS, FIRST SHOW BEAUTIFUL NESS OF YOUR LAWS AND THEN SHOW IT TO OTHERS THEY WILL AUTOMATICALLY FOLLOW, BUT DON'T FORCE THEM.
!! HARE KRISHNA !! HARE KRISHNA !! KRISHNA KRISHNA !! HARE HARE !!
!! HARE RAMA !! HARE RAMA !! RAMA RAMA !! HARE HARE !!
OM NAMO BAGHAVATE VASUDEYA
OM NAMO NARAYANAYA
OM NAMA SHIVAYA
OM NAMO LAXMI NARAYANA
OM NAMO PARAVATHI PERMESHWARYA
OM NAMO LAXMI NARSHIMA SWAMY
NOTE: FEW CONTENT AND REFERENCE FROM WIKIPEDIA
LINK: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_religion_in_India
Tuesday, April 8, 2014
Sunday, April 6, 2014
Thursday, March 20, 2014
"Malecha" - Prophet Muhammad in Bhavishya Purana - Zakir Naik Exposed by...
Reference from :Wikipedia
Meaning of Malecha or Mleccha: Who is Mleccha and its relations to Hinduism /Sanathana Dharma (Mleccha are now called Muslims...Zakir naik is agreed)
Meaning and Definition:-
Mlecchas were born of the cow (belonging to Vasishtha),
of fierce eyes, accomplished in smiting looking like messengers of
Death, and all conversant with the deceptive powers of the Asuras
In the Mahabharata the root Sanskrit word barbar meant stammering, wretch, foreigner, sinful people, low and barbarous.[3] The Vayu, Matsya and Brahmanda Puranas state that the seven Himalayan rivers pass through the Mleccha countries.[4][5] Brahmanas lay mlecchas outside the varna system.[6][7] Southworth suggests that the name comes from mizi meaning 'speak', or 'one's speech' derived from Dravidian for language.[8](see Southworth's etymological derivation of Tamil) The term 'Menchha' was also used by the medieval Marathi saint Samarth Ramdas.[9] Buddhist scriptures use the terms 'Milakkha' or 'Milakkhuka' to refer to Mlecchas.
In ancient India, this term was also applied by the ancient Indian
kingdoms to foreigners. The word Mleccha was commonly used for 'outer
barbarians of whatever race or colour'.[10][11] The Indians referred to all alien cultures that were less civilized in ancient times as 'Mlechcha'[12] or Barbarians. The Mlecchas were people who were barbaric[13] Among the tribes termed Mlechcha were Sakas, Huns, Yavanas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Bahlikas and Rishikas.[14] The Amara-kosa described the Kiratas and Pulindas as the Mleccha-jatis. Indo-Greeks, Scythians,[15] and Kushanas,[16] were also mlecchas.[17][1
derived from the Indo-Aryan perception of the speech of the indigenous
peoples. Namely, "mlech" was a word that meant "to speak indistinctly."
As such, some suggest that the Indo-Aryans used an onomatopoetic sound
to imitate the harshness of alien tongue and to indicate
incomprehension, thus coming up with "mleccha".[19]
Early Indians spoke Sanskrit, which later got mutated to various
local tongues that we now have. Sanskrit is believed to have all the
sounds that are necessary for communication. If unfamiliar languages
were detected, early Indians would club them as foreign- meleccha basha.
As the Sanskrit word itself suggests, "mlecchas" were those whose
speech was alien.[20]
Historians cite that knowledge of "correct speech" was a crucial
component of being about to take part in the appropriate religious
rituals and sacrifices. Thus, without correct speech, one could not hope
to practice correct religion, either.
The notion of being Arya suggested a knowledge of Sanskrit in order
to effectively perform ritual hymns; thus suggesting the importance of
language. Parasher discusses the importance of knowing the correct speech in order to perform sacrifice and ritual in the religion of the brahmanas. Parasher continued that: "The best experts of the sacrificial art were undoubtedly the various families of the brahmanas who, placed in a hierarchy within the Indo-Aryan social system, became the upholders of pure and best speech".[21]
Historians note that early Indians believed that Sanskrit was the
superior language over all other forms of speech. As such, mleccha or
barbarian speech was said to have meant any of the following: "1) a
language which was not necessarily alien, but the speech of the person
or persons was improper because it was either hostile or vulgar; 2) a
language, and here most probably Sanskrit, that was mispronounced and,
thereby, incomprehensible: 3) finally, any foreign tongue which was
naturally incomprehensible because it was unintelligible to those who
did not understand a particular language".[22]
Professor Vasudeva Sharana Agrawala admits that the Indians were familiar with the mleccha language right from the time of Shatapatha Brahmana. In support of the contention he quotes the Mbh.(Adi Parva,2/103), which refers to the talks between Vidur and Yudhisthira in mleccha language. The latter explained the mleccha language to Kunti
in Sanskrit, because it was indistinct for her. During the epic age
some people having acquaintance with the Asuras used to speak their
mleccha language. The Jaimini Dharmasastra (1.3.10) mentions
certain mleccha words i.e. pika, nema, sata and tamaras meaning
respectively a bird, a half, a vessel, a red lotus.
'foreigners' - those living outside of the Indian subcontinent - was
often accompanied by the idea that one was a barbarian. Still, it seemed
that groups who did not come from outside of these areas, as well as
foreigners, were designated by the term mleccha, which carried with it a
barbarian connotation.[23]
Thus another distinction that was made between the mlecchas and
non-mlecchas was area of habitation. Though they were considered a
marginal group, the area characterize as the mleccha-desa (the natural
border that separated their lands from that of the Aryans) was never
permanent. Instead, it was defined by the changing ideas about the Aryavarta. Parasher noted that "the only consistent areas dubbed as mleccha desa
were those regions inhabited by 'primitive tribes' who for long periods
of time did not come under the sway of the brahmanical, Buddhist or
Jaina influence".[24]
Though the area of the aryas expanded with time, the notion that was
held over all of the land was that of "purity." As Vedic literature
refers only to the places and territories that were familiar to the
Indo-Aryans, these lands eventually became part of the Aryavarta.
Parasher thus indicates that the Aryavarta was designated as: "The
region where the river Sarasvati disappears is the Patiala district in
the Punjab. The Pariyatra mountains belong to the Vindhya range,
probably the hills of Malwa. The Kalakavana is identified with a tract
somewhere near Prayaga." Still, other interpretations of the Aryavarta
refer to those areas where the black antelope roams, for these areas are
fit for the performance of sacrifice. Early Vedic literature focused on
defining the area of habitation of the aryas for this land was
considered pure; yet there is no actual reference to the mleccha country
or behavior. Wherever the territory, though, the implications of naming
such lands as the Aryavarta is that any lands excluded from that area
were considered impure.[25]
Further, there is evidence that Indians of the Vedic period actually
had contact with people outside of the subcontinent, namely the
Persians. The Persians, who ruled over the Indus river valley during
this time (522-486 BC) were not designated as mleccha, perhaps because
they did not interfere with the brahmanical way of life.[26]
Later Vedic literature speaks of the western Anava tribes as mlecchas and occupying northern Punjab, Sindh and eastern Rajasthan. The tribes of the north were mlecchas either because they were located on the frontiers such as Gandhara, Kashmira and Kambojas and therefore both their speech and culture had become contaminated and differed from that of Aryavarta, or else, as in the case of South Indians, they were once Aryas but having forsaken the Vedic rituals were regarded to mleccha status.[27
classify those who did not subscribe to the "traditional value system,"
though the characteristics of the so-called system were ambiguous. In
sum, though, the idea was that the mlecchas were peoples who did not
conform to what was culturally acceptable.[28]
Early writings refer to these foreign peoples as "half-civilized,
unconverted people who rise or eat at improper times." They stated that
monks and nuns should avoid certain areas of habitation because they
were unsafe. Namely, that "the ignorant populace might beat, harass, rob
them under the impression that they were spies from hostile villages."
Further, while some of these non-mlecchas, such as those of the Jaina
faith, had established contact with people of the forest tribes, they
were automatically designated as mlecchas. Such was the typical attitude
of people from the plains who took pride in their norms of settled
agricultural and urban lifestyles.[29]
Historians note that there were also systems in place to determine
the validity - or "purity" - of certain customs, which would ultimately
be judged by the brahmanas. As such there were intricate rules in place
to define purity from impurity, laws of behavior, as well as rituals and
customs, in an effort to educate the members of the brahmanical system.
Namely, these advisors took great pains to ensure that peoples of the
brahmanical system did not subscribe to any mleccha customs or rituals.[30]
The sanskritizing of names was a common feature among both indigenous
and foreign mlecchas who slowly tried to move away from their status of
mleccha. Very often, in the case of ruling families, it took one to two
generations to make a transition. One of the most direct forms of the
expression of the brahmanical ritual purity was the form and type of
food which a brahman could eat. He was forbidden to accept cooked food
from any nonbrahman. Thus when the Punjab
became a mleccha area the staple food was given a lower place in the
food-ranking. By the twelfth century AD wheat was described in one
lexicon as 'food of the mlecchas' and rice became the 'pure' cereal. Onions and garlic were also regarded as the food of the mlecchas and therefore prohibited to the brahman. Mlecchas drank alcohol and ate flesh of the cow, and this in later periods was strictly forbidden to an Indian.[31][
some Mleccha warriors are described as having "heads completely shaved
or half-shaved or covered with matted locks, [as being] impure in
habits, and of crooked faces and noses[33] They are "dwellers of hills" and "denizens of mountain-caves. Mlecchas were born of the cow (belonging to Vasishtha),
of fierce eyes, accomplished in smiting looking like messengers of
Death, and all conversant with the deceptive powers of the Asuras"[34] Chanakya refers to mleccha forces once attacked Chandragupta.
According to Swami Parmeshwaranand[citation needed]
Mleccha tribe was born from the tail of the celestial cow Nandini, kept
by Vashishta for sacrificial purposes when there was a fight between Vishvamitra and Vasistha. Mahabharata gives the following information regarding them:-
The term is not attested in the Vedas, but occurs for the first time in the late Vedic text Shatapatha Brahmana. The law giver Baudhâyana
defines a Mleccha as someone "who eats meat or indulges in
self-contradictory statements or is devoid of righteousness and purity
of conduct". Mleccha could refer to any being who follow different
teachings than Vedic beliefs. In the Indian history some indigenous
rulers in Assam were called Mlechhas (Mlechchha dynasty). In the Bhagavata Purana the term is used in the context of meat eaters, outcastes.
Medieval Hindu literature, such as that of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, also uses the term to refer to those of larger groups of other religions, especially Muslims.[37] In medieval India, a foreign visitor Al Biruni
(died 1048) noted that foreigners were regarded as 'unclean' or
'Mleccha' and Hindus were forbidden any social or matrimonial contact
with them.[38]
Meaning of Malecha or Mleccha: Who is Mleccha and its relations to Hinduism /Sanathana Dharma (Mleccha are now called Muslims...Zakir naik is agreed)
Meaning and Definition:-
Mlecchas were born of the cow (belonging to Vasishtha),
of fierce eyes, accomplished in smiting looking like messengers of
Death, and all conversant with the deceptive powers of the Asuras
For the dynasty of Kamarupa, see Mlechchha dynasty.
Mleccha (from Vedic Sanskrit म्लेच्छ mleccha, meaning "non-Vedic", "barbarian"), also spelt Mlechchha, referred to people of foreign extraction in ancient India. Mleccha was used by the ancient Indians much as the ancient Greeks used barbaros, originally to indicate the uncouth and incomprehensible speech of foreigners and then extended to their unfamiliar behaviour.[1][2]In the Mahabharata the root Sanskrit word barbar meant stammering, wretch, foreigner, sinful people, low and barbarous.[3] The Vayu, Matsya and Brahmanda Puranas state that the seven Himalayan rivers pass through the Mleccha countries.[4][5] Brahmanas lay mlecchas outside the varna system.[6][7] Southworth suggests that the name comes from mizi meaning 'speak', or 'one's speech' derived from Dravidian for language.[8](see Southworth's etymological derivation of Tamil) The term 'Menchha' was also used by the medieval Marathi saint Samarth Ramdas.[9] Buddhist scriptures use the terms 'Milakkha' or 'Milakkhuka' to refer to Mlecchas.
In ancient India, this term was also applied by the ancient Indian
kingdoms to foreigners. The word Mleccha was commonly used for 'outer
barbarians of whatever race or colour'.[10][11] The Indians referred to all alien cultures that were less civilized in ancient times as 'Mlechcha'[12] or Barbarians. The Mlecchas were people who were barbaric[13] Among the tribes termed Mlechcha were Sakas, Huns, Yavanas, Kambojas, Pahlavas, Bahlikas and Rishikas.[14] The Amara-kosa described the Kiratas and Pulindas as the Mleccha-jatis. Indo-Greeks, Scythians,[15] and Kushanas,[16] were also mlecchas.[17][1
Language
Some explanations of the name "mleccha" suggest that the word wasderived from the Indo-Aryan perception of the speech of the indigenous
peoples. Namely, "mlech" was a word that meant "to speak indistinctly."
As such, some suggest that the Indo-Aryans used an onomatopoetic sound
to imitate the harshness of alien tongue and to indicate
incomprehension, thus coming up with "mleccha".[19]
Early Indians spoke Sanskrit, which later got mutated to various
local tongues that we now have. Sanskrit is believed to have all the
sounds that are necessary for communication. If unfamiliar languages
were detected, early Indians would club them as foreign- meleccha basha.
As the Sanskrit word itself suggests, "mlecchas" were those whose
speech was alien.[20]
Historians cite that knowledge of "correct speech" was a crucial
component of being about to take part in the appropriate religious
rituals and sacrifices. Thus, without correct speech, one could not hope
to practice correct religion, either.
The notion of being Arya suggested a knowledge of Sanskrit in order
to effectively perform ritual hymns; thus suggesting the importance of
language. Parasher discusses the importance of knowing the correct speech in order to perform sacrifice and ritual in the religion of the brahmanas. Parasher continued that: "The best experts of the sacrificial art were undoubtedly the various families of the brahmanas who, placed in a hierarchy within the Indo-Aryan social system, became the upholders of pure and best speech".[21]
Historians note that early Indians believed that Sanskrit was the
superior language over all other forms of speech. As such, mleccha or
barbarian speech was said to have meant any of the following: "1) a
language which was not necessarily alien, but the speech of the person
or persons was improper because it was either hostile or vulgar; 2) a
language, and here most probably Sanskrit, that was mispronounced and,
thereby, incomprehensible: 3) finally, any foreign tongue which was
naturally incomprehensible because it was unintelligible to those who
did not understand a particular language".[22]
Professor Vasudeva Sharana Agrawala admits that the Indians were familiar with the mleccha language right from the time of Shatapatha Brahmana. In support of the contention he quotes the Mbh.(Adi Parva,2/103), which refers to the talks between Vidur and Yudhisthira in mleccha language. The latter explained the mleccha language to Kunti
in Sanskrit, because it was indistinct for her. During the epic age
some people having acquaintance with the Asuras used to speak their
mleccha language. The Jaimini Dharmasastra (1.3.10) mentions
certain mleccha words i.e. pika, nema, sata and tamaras meaning
respectively a bird, a half, a vessel, a red lotus.
Territory
In Ancient India, historians have stated that the notion of'foreigners' - those living outside of the Indian subcontinent - was
often accompanied by the idea that one was a barbarian. Still, it seemed
that groups who did not come from outside of these areas, as well as
foreigners, were designated by the term mleccha, which carried with it a
barbarian connotation.[23]
Thus another distinction that was made between the mlecchas and
non-mlecchas was area of habitation. Though they were considered a
marginal group, the area characterize as the mleccha-desa (the natural
border that separated their lands from that of the Aryans) was never
permanent. Instead, it was defined by the changing ideas about the Aryavarta. Parasher noted that "the only consistent areas dubbed as mleccha desa
were those regions inhabited by 'primitive tribes' who for long periods
of time did not come under the sway of the brahmanical, Buddhist or
Jaina influence".[24]
Though the area of the aryas expanded with time, the notion that was
held over all of the land was that of "purity." As Vedic literature
refers only to the places and territories that were familiar to the
Indo-Aryans, these lands eventually became part of the Aryavarta.
Parasher thus indicates that the Aryavarta was designated as: "The
region where the river Sarasvati disappears is the Patiala district in
the Punjab. The Pariyatra mountains belong to the Vindhya range,
probably the hills of Malwa. The Kalakavana is identified with a tract
somewhere near Prayaga." Still, other interpretations of the Aryavarta
refer to those areas where the black antelope roams, for these areas are
fit for the performance of sacrifice. Early Vedic literature focused on
defining the area of habitation of the aryas for this land was
considered pure; yet there is no actual reference to the mleccha country
or behavior. Wherever the territory, though, the implications of naming
such lands as the Aryavarta is that any lands excluded from that area
were considered impure.[25]
Further, there is evidence that Indians of the Vedic period actually
had contact with people outside of the subcontinent, namely the
Persians. The Persians, who ruled over the Indus river valley during
this time (522-486 BC) were not designated as mleccha, perhaps because
they did not interfere with the brahmanical way of life.[26]
Later Vedic literature speaks of the western Anava tribes as mlecchas and occupying northern Punjab, Sindh and eastern Rajasthan. The tribes of the north were mlecchas either because they were located on the frontiers such as Gandhara, Kashmira and Kambojas and therefore both their speech and culture had become contaminated and differed from that of Aryavarta, or else, as in the case of South Indians, they were once Aryas but having forsaken the Vedic rituals were regarded to mleccha status.[27
Cultural behavior
The word mleccha emerged as a way for the ancient Indians toclassify those who did not subscribe to the "traditional value system,"
though the characteristics of the so-called system were ambiguous. In
sum, though, the idea was that the mlecchas were peoples who did not
conform to what was culturally acceptable.[28]
Early writings refer to these foreign peoples as "half-civilized,
unconverted people who rise or eat at improper times." They stated that
monks and nuns should avoid certain areas of habitation because they
were unsafe. Namely, that "the ignorant populace might beat, harass, rob
them under the impression that they were spies from hostile villages."
Further, while some of these non-mlecchas, such as those of the Jaina
faith, had established contact with people of the forest tribes, they
were automatically designated as mlecchas. Such was the typical attitude
of people from the plains who took pride in their norms of settled
agricultural and urban lifestyles.[29]
Historians note that there were also systems in place to determine
the validity - or "purity" - of certain customs, which would ultimately
be judged by the brahmanas. As such there were intricate rules in place
to define purity from impurity, laws of behavior, as well as rituals and
customs, in an effort to educate the members of the brahmanical system.
Namely, these advisors took great pains to ensure that peoples of the
brahmanical system did not subscribe to any mleccha customs or rituals.[30]
The sanskritizing of names was a common feature among both indigenous
and foreign mlecchas who slowly tried to move away from their status of
mleccha. Very often, in the case of ruling families, it took one to two
generations to make a transition. One of the most direct forms of the
expression of the brahmanical ritual purity was the form and type of
food which a brahman could eat. He was forbidden to accept cooked food
from any nonbrahman. Thus when the Punjab
became a mleccha area the staple food was given a lower place in the
food-ranking. By the twelfth century AD wheat was described in one
lexicon as 'food of the mlecchas' and rice became the 'pure' cereal. Onions and garlic were also regarded as the food of the mlecchas and therefore prohibited to the brahman. Mlecchas drank alcohol and ate flesh of the cow, and this in later periods was strictly forbidden to an Indian.[31][
Literature describing the Mleccha (Highlight Paragraph)
In the epic Mahabharata,some Mleccha warriors are described as having "heads completely shaved
or half-shaved or covered with matted locks, [as being] impure in
habits, and of crooked faces and noses[33] They are "dwellers of hills" and "denizens of mountain-caves. Mlecchas were born of the cow (belonging to Vasishtha),
of fierce eyes, accomplished in smiting looking like messengers of
Death, and all conversant with the deceptive powers of the Asuras"[34] Chanakya refers to mleccha forces once attacked Chandragupta.
According to Swami Parmeshwaranand[citation needed]
Mleccha tribe was born from the tail of the celestial cow Nandini, kept
by Vashishta for sacrificial purposes when there was a fight between Vishvamitra and Vasistha. Mahabharata gives the following information regarding them:-
- Mleccha who sprang up from the tail of the celestial cow Nandini sent the army of Viswamitra flying in terror.
- Bhagadatta was the king of mlecchas.
- Pandavas, like Bhimsean, Nakul and Sahadeva once defeated them.
- Karna during his world campaign conquered many mlaccha countries.
- The wealth that remained in the Yagasala of Yudhisthira after the distribution as gifts to Brahmins was taken away by the mlecchas.
- The melecchas drove angered elephants on the army of the Pandavas.
The term is not attested in the Vedas, but occurs for the first time in the late Vedic text Shatapatha Brahmana. The law giver Baudhâyana
defines a Mleccha as someone "who eats meat or indulges in
self-contradictory statements or is devoid of righteousness and purity
of conduct". Mleccha could refer to any being who follow different
teachings than Vedic beliefs. In the Indian history some indigenous
rulers in Assam were called Mlechhas (Mlechchha dynasty). In the Bhagavata Purana the term is used in the context of meat eaters, outcastes.
Medieval Hindu literature, such as that of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, also uses the term to refer to those of larger groups of other religions, especially Muslims.[37] In medieval India, a foreign visitor Al Biruni
(died 1048) noted that foreigners were regarded as 'unclean' or
'Mleccha' and Hindus were forbidden any social or matrimonial contact
with them.[38]
Tuesday, March 18, 2014
Monday, March 17, 2014
Freedom of Religion-Everyone have the Freedom to Choose-by Lord MahaVishnu
My Lord Sri Krishna/(your Lord-Vedic Shiva-Allah) said in Geeta.. Sri
Krishna Says “ Sarva Dharm Samabhav Means “ All religions are equall” If
a person is a very great devotee of me then also if he Intolerant
towards other people belief's and other religion, then he is not
following me. A person who respect every one belief's and other religion
and as every one have freedom to choose their religion, there must not
differentiation of beliefs as following ones beliefs doesn't mean
disrespecting another's belief. As all religions are just like a rivers
flowing in different area and culture and values but finally merge in
ocean like wise all religions are a just a path of god home.
Krishna Says “ Sarva Dharm Samabhav Means “ All religions are equall” If
a person is a very great devotee of me then also if he Intolerant
towards other people belief's and other religion, then he is not
following me. A person who respect every one belief's and other religion
and as every one have freedom to choose their religion, there must not
differentiation of beliefs as following ones beliefs doesn't mean
disrespecting another's belief. As all religions are just like a rivers
flowing in different area and culture and values but finally merge in
ocean like wise all religions are a just a path of god home.
Sunday, March 16, 2014
Monday, March 10, 2014
Avatars of Lord Sri Krishna-Full Series with English SubTitles
Avatara (Sanskrit: avataranam means "the decent of Supreme Being on earth for the ascent of man"), means ‘descent’, and usually implies a deliberate descent of the Divine into the mortal realms to reveal the Absolute Truth to humanity and remind them of their true divine nature. This voluntary ‘descent’ into the world out of boundless compassion for all creatures is called avatara and has 4 basic purposes; 1. Protection of the righteous; 2. Elimination of the wicked; 3. Re-establishment of Dharma (righteousness) and 4. Bestowing of Grace.
Description
Avatara concept is used primarily in Hinduism for descents of Vishnu whom Vaishnava Hindus worship as the Supreme God. Shivaand Ganesha are also described as descending in the form of avatars. The Ganesha Purana and the Mudgala Purana offers the details of Ganesha`s avatars specifically, the avatars of Vishnu also carry a greater theological prominence than those of Shiva or Ganesha and upon examination relevant passages are directly derivative of the Vaishnava avatara lists.
The most traditional form of Avatar within Hinduism is the incarnations of Vishnu, the preserver or sustainer aspect of God within theTrimurti or Hindu Trinity. Dasavatara is the ten Avatars of Vishnu in the Garuda Purana. Matsya is first avatar of Vishnu. However, the ten most famous descents of Vishnu are collectively known as the "Dasavatara" and denote avatars who were most prominent in terms of their influence on human society.
The first four of the avataras appeared in the Satya Yuga and the first of the four Yugas or ages in the time cycle were described within Hinduism. The next three avatars appeared in the Treta Yuga, the eighth descent in the Dwapara Yuga and the ninth in theKali Yuga. The tenth is destined to appear at the end of the Kali Yuga after some 427,000 years.
Though Avatars may appear in different forms at different times, places and circumstances, yet they are all the manifestations of the One Supreme Lord.
Shri Krishna says :-
Though unborn, the Imperishable Self and also the Lord of all beings, yet brooding over nature which is Mine own, I am born through My Own Power. Whenever there is decline of righteousness, then I Myself come forth. For the protection of the good, for the destruction of the evil-doers, for the sake of firmly establishing righteousness, I am born from age to age (Ch. IV-6, 7, 8).
Degrees of Avatara
There are Purna Avatara (full incarnations), Amsa Avatara (partial incarnations), Avesa Avatara (inspirational incarnations or indirect), etc.
Six Categories Of Avataras
- Purusha Avatara — Described as the original avatars of Vishnu or Krishna within the Universe.
- Lila Avatara — Pastime incarnations.
- Guna Avatara — Are associated with the Trimurti because of their roles of controlling the three modes or gunas of nature.
- Manvantara Avatara — are beings, who are responsible for creating descendants throughout the Universe, and are unlimited in number. They do not take birth but evolve spiritually.
- Yuga Avatara — Incarnations during a specific yuga.
- Satyavesa Avatara — The saktyavesa incarnations are of two kinds - direct and indirect. Incarnations of jivas, or living beings, empowered for a special mission.
Purusha avataras
Krishna first incarnates as the three purusha avataras namely:
- Karanodakashayi Vishnu — "The Lord who is lying on the causal ocean".
- Garbhodakashayi Vishnu — "The Lord who is lying on the universal ocean".
- Kshirodakashayi Vishnu — "The Lord who is lying on the ocean of milk".
Lila avataras
A list of Lila avataras (pastime incarnations) mentioned in the Srimad Bhagavatam:
- Kumaras
- Narada
- Varaha
- Matsya
- yagna
- Nara-Narayana
- Kardami
- Dattatreya
- Hayasirsa
- Hamsa
- Dhruvapriya or Prsniggarbha
- Rsabha
- Prthu
- Nrsmha
- Kurma
- Dhanvantari
- Mohini
- Vamana
- Bhargava Parasurama
- Ramachandra
- Vyasa
- Prlambhari Balarama
- Krishna
- Buddha
- Kalki
Guna avataras:
The Trimurtis assumes this guna avatara post:
- Vishnu — Sattvik Guna (Mode of goodness, Maintanence)
- Brahma — Rajik Guna (Mode of passion, Creation)
- Siva — Tamas Guna (Mode of ignorence, Destruction)
Manvantara avataras
Brahma's day — 1,000 catur yugas — is divided into fourteen periods of the rule of Manus (fathers of mankind) known asmanvantaras. The incarnations during these manvantaras are listed as follows:
- yagna
- Vibhu
- Satyasena
- Hari
- Vaikuntha
- Ajita
- Sarvabhauma
- Rsabha
- Visvaksena
- Dharma
- Sudhama
- Yogesvara
- Brhadbhanu
Yuga avataras
In each of these yugas the Lord incarnates with a different body color according to the yuga.
asan varnas trayo hy asya
grhnato ‘nuyugam tanuh
suklo raktas tatha pita
idanim krishnatam gatah“Krishna appears as an incarnation in every millennium. In the past, He assumed three different colors - white, red and yellow - and now he has appeared in a blackish color.”
- Srimad Bhagavatam 10.8.13
- In the Satya yuga a white avatara appeared to Kardama muni to establish meditation as the process for self-realization.
- In the Treta yuga a red avatara appeared to Brahma to establish fire sacrifice as the process for self-realization.
- In the Dvapara yuga a dark avatara (Krishna) appeared as the son of Devaki to establish temple worship as the process for self-realization.
- In the Kali yuga a Yellow avatara appeared (Chaitanya Mahaprabhu) as the son of Sachi Mata to establish the chanting of the holy names (nama-sankirtana) as the process for self-realization.
Shaktyavesha avataras
There is no limit to the number of shaktyavesha incarnations. But some are mentioned in the vedic literatures as examples. They are of two kinds, direct and indirect. When the Lord Himself expands displaying a particular power of His opulences He is known as Sakshat. When He empowers a living entity with some particular sakti - power, for some specific activity, to represent Him , that living entity is called indirect or avesha incarnation.
Avesha incarnations
Four Kumaras empowered with knowledge.
- Narada empowered with devotional service.
- Brahma empowered with creative power.
- King Pritu empowered with power to maintain living beings.
- Parasurama empowered with power to kill evil elements.
- VedaVyasa to compile the vedas.
Many Many more.
Twenty-two avataras of Vishnu
Twenty-two avatars of Vishnu are listed numerically in the first Canto of the Bhagavata Purana that include Narada or the traveling sage, Dattatreya or the combined avatara of the Trimurti, Prithu or the king who made earth beautiful and attractive, Vyasa or the compiler of Vedas and so on. Other than the mentioned ones, there are other avataras too like Prshnigarbha, born to Prshni;Hayagriva or the horse and Hamsa or the swan.
After Kalki avatar is described in the Bhagavata Purana it is declared that the avatars of Vishnu are uncountable. However twenty-five avatars of Vishnu is generally taken as of those of greatest significance. According to Gaudiya Vaishnava interpretation in texts of the Bhagavata Purana, and a number of texts from the epics and Puranic scriptures, Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is also considered as an avatar and is worshiped as such by followers of the tradition. Chaitanya Mahaprabhu is often referred to as the Golden Avatar.
In the Vaishnava branch of Hinduism, Vishnu is only one divine being that manifests in form. Thus Narayana, Vasudeva andKrishna are also seen as names denoting divine aspects, which take avataric form. Purusha avataras are sometimes described as the original avatars of Vishnu or Krishna within the Universe, such as Vasudeva, Sankarshan, Pradyumna and Aniruddha. Guna avatars are associated with the Trimurti concept. The personalities of the Trimurti are also sometimes referred to as Guna avataras, because of their roles of controlling the three modes or gunas of nature. However, they have not descended upon an earthly planet in the general sense of the term `avatar`.
Vishnu, as the controller of the mode of goodness or Sattva, creates his avataras in the respective field, while Brahma as the controller of the mode of passion and desire or the rajas and Shiva as the controller of the mode of ignorance or the tamas.Manvantara avataras are beings, who are responsible for creating descendants throughout the Universe, and are unlimited in number. They do not take birth but evolve spiritually. Shaktyavesa and Avesa avataras are either direct (sakshat) or indirect (avesa).
When Vishnu himself descends, he is called sakshat or shaktyavesa avatara. He is referred to as the direct incarnation of God. But when he does not incarnate directly, but indirectly empowers some living entity to represent him, that living entity is called an indirect or avesa avatar. There are a great number of avesa avatars; some of the important ones are Shakyamuni Buddha, Narada Muni, and Parashurama. Parashurama is the only one of the traditional ten avatars that is not a direct descent of Vishnu.
There are two types of primary or direct avatars, Purna avataras and Amsarupavatars. The purna avatars are those in which Vishnu takes his form directly and all the qualities and powers of God are expressed, like Narasimha, Rama and Krishna.Amsarupavatars are those in which Vishnu takes form directly but the Lord is manifested in the person only partially, like Matsya andParashurama. The avesa or indirect avatars are generally not worshiped as the Supreme Being.
Among most Vaishnava traditions, Lord Krishna is considered to be the highest Purna avatar. However, followers of Chaitanya,Nimbarka, and Vallabha Acharya have a different philosophy from the other Vaishnavas, such as Ramanujacharya andMadhvacharya consider Krishna to be the ultimate Godhead, not simply an avatar. All Hindus believe that there is no difference between worshiping Lord Vishnu and His avatars as it all leads to Him.
Besides the tradition of Hinduism, some other Indian personalities were considered as avatars. Meher Baba (1894-1969), Mother Meera (1960-present) of Adipara-Shakti, Sathya Sai Baba (1926-present) of Shiva, Shakti and Krishna and Adi Da Samraj (1939-2008) were the divine incarnations in human form.
References
Bibliography
1. Avatara, indianetzone.com.
2. Six Categories Of Avatars, dharmakshetra.com.
3. Incarnations and Expansions of the Lord, VEDA - Bhaktivedanta Book Trust
4. Reference and link taken from - http://veda.wikidot.com/avatara#toc10
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)